EIR Addendum No. 2 for North Campus Site Consolidation Project (Original EIR certified in 1992)

SCH Number: 1991071053
Lead Agency: Los Angeles County
Document Title: EIR Addendum No. 2 for North Campus Site Consolidation Project (Original EIR certified in 1992)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 8/1/2014

Document Description: The purpose of the 2014 refined project is to relocate the previously approved warehouse structure on the North Campus of the Rancho Los Amigos Medical Center, allocate space for a new Accessible Gymnasium, Wellness and Aquatic Therapy Center on the campus, and document the location of up to 55,000 sq. ft. of temporary modular buildings for the construction phase. The other elements of the approved project would remain unchanged, and there would be no net increase in total sq. ft. of buildings from the approved project. The original EIR was certified on April 7, 1992, and EIR Addendum No. 1 was certified on April 19, 2013. The EIR Addendum was prepared for refinements to the project that did no increase the severity of any of the originally disclosed impacts or create new impacts that were not analyzed in the original document. Therefore, no new mitigation measures were required, and no new findings were required. The original 1992 MMRP remains enforced.

Contact Information: Hannah Chen
County of Los Angeles
500 West Temple Street Room 754
Los Angeles, CA 90012
213-974-2273

Approving Agency: County of Los Angeles Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 7/29/2014
Final EIR Available Location: County of Los Angeles Chief Executive Office, 500 West Temple Street, Room 754, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No