Tentative Tract 47807-01
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
1989080910
Lead Agency
Los Angeles County
Document Title
Tentative Tract 47807-01
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/24/2011
Document Description
The CDFG is entering into a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement (SAA #1600-2010-0204-R5 revision2) with Sikand Engineering, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code. Sikand Engineering intends to alter the streambed by altering three unnamed tributaries (drainages) within a 114-acre parcel proposed for development of a 33-lot subdivision. A total of 0.86 acres will be permanently impacted by filling in these areas. Two remaining drainages on site will be outside of the grading limits and not impacted. The site will also contain three debris basins and one large detention basin which will outlet in to Romero Canyon Creek.
The project boundaries for impacts extend to the north outside of the parcel owned by the Permittee (0.054 acres of impact to jurisdictional areas). Documentation was provided by the adjacent landowner that allows grading impacts to occur within these areas, which are identified within the grading plans.
This project is also related to previous project described under Notification No. 1600-2006-0370-R5, submitted by the same Permittee. However, no agreement was finalized for this previous notification and certain aspects of the project have changed in comparison with the past and current project scope.
Contact Information
Name
Jeff Humble
Agency Name
DFG - South Coast Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
VAL VERDE
Counties
Los Angeles
Total Acres
199
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
DFG
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.