M2 Waterman RV Storage Project (PLNG23-018)

Summary

SCH Number
2024090230
Public Agency
City of Elk Grove
Document Title
M2 Waterman RV Storage Project (PLNG23-018)
Document Type
NOE - Notice of Exemption
Received
Posted
9/9/2024
Document Description
The M2 Waterman RV Storage Project (the “Project”) consists of a Conditional Use Permit and Major Design Review with Deviation for a new Recreational Vehicle (RV) storage facility, as well as a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the ±16.02-acre parcel into 7 lots. The Project includes a Tree Permit for the removal of one tree of local importance. The proposed RV storage facility Is located on Parcel 7 of the proposed map. No development is currently proposed on Parcels 1-6 as part of the Project; subsequent approvals may be required in the future

Contact Information

Name
Sarah Kirchgessner
Agency Name
City of Elk Grove
Job Title
Senior Planner
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Elk Grove
Counties
Sacramento
Regions
Citywide
Parcel #
134-0110-193 and 134-0110-188
Other Location Info
9846 Waterman Road and 9250 Charolais Way

Notice of Exemption

Exempt Status
Other
Type, Section or Code
Consistent With a Community Plan or Zoning [Section 15183(a)]
Reasons for Exemption
No further environmental review is required under State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Consistency with a General Plan, Community Plan, or Zoning). State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183 (Public Resources Code §21083.3), provides that projects which are consistent with the development density established by an existing Community Plan, General Plan, or Zoning for which an environmental impact report (EIR) has been certified “shall not require additional environmental review, except as might be necessary to examine whether there are project-specific significant effects which are peculiar to the project or its site.” In February 2019, an EIR was prepared and certified by the City Council as part of the Elk Grove General Plan (SCH# 2017062058). The Project is subject to the General Plan MMRP. The Project will result in a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 0.01 which is below the maximum FAR in the MP zone of 2.0. As the proposed use of “auto and vehicle storage” is conditionally allowed and the proposed development intensity is below the maximum FAR, the proposed Project will be consistent with the General Plan. As the proposed Project includes a conditionally allowed use within the allowed density range, the proposed Project is consistent with the General Plan The General Plan EIR relies on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) as a measure of transportation impacts. A VMT analysis was prepared by Fehr and Peers for the Project, dated June 13, 2024, which determined that the Project would not exceed General Plan VMT limit for the Light Industrial zone or the City’s VMT limit for buildout condition. The Project shall comply with the City’s Climate Action Plan (CAP) for new nonresidential development, including CAP measures related to energy efficiency (BE-4), electric appliances (BE-6), off-road construction fleet (TACM-8), and electric vehicle charging (TACM-9). A Cultural Resources Study was prepared for the Project pursuant to the General Plan requirements. Conditions of approval to address accidental discovery have been placed on the Project. Additionally, a Biological Assessment was prepared for the Project site (Madrone Ecological Consulting, June 2024), which identified the site as foraging habitat for the Swainson’s Hawk. As the site was identified as suitable foraging habitat, the applicant shall comply with the Swainson’s Hawk mitigation measures set forth in EGMC Chapter 16.130 and shall conduct pre-construction surveys requirements if construction activities take place during the typical bird breeding/nesting season. These recommendations have been included as conditions of approval on the Project. No potential new impacts related to the Project have been identified that would necessitate further environmental review beyond the impacts and issues already disclosed and analyzed in the General Plan EIR. No other special circumstances exist that would create a reasonable possibility that the Project will have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Therefore, the prior EIR is sufficient to support the proposed action and pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15183, no further environmental review is required.
County Clerk
Sacramento

Attachments

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV New Search Print