Contra Costa County Housing Element Update

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2022070481
Lead Agency
Contra Costa County
Document Title
Contra Costa County Housing Element Update
Document Type
NOP - Notice of Preparation of a Draft EIR
Received
Document Description
The Contra Costa County Housing Element Update (proposed project) is one of the required elements of the General Plan. As a policy document, the Housing Element does not normally result in physical changes to the environment but rather encourages the provision of affordable housing within the land use designations shown in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. The Housing Element identifies policy direction to meet the housing needs of the County by preserving existing homes and clarifying priorities for housing creation. The proposed Housing Element will include an overview of housing policies and programs and will identify locations that can accommodate future housing. The proposed project will require that the County redesignate land to meet the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 7,610 total housing units. The County also intends to comply with No-Net-Loss (Gov. Code Section 65863) through identifying a surplus of sites available to meet its RHNA allocation. In total, the County’s surplus unit capacity is 2,485 units. In order to meet this requirement, the County must redesignate up to approximately 560 acres of land. The proposed project would require changes in land use designations for sites that currently allow residential uses but would need to be redesignated to allow for increased residential density, in addition to sites with designations that do not currently allow residential density and would need to be redesignated to allow residential development. The Housing Element Update also includes an additional 92 acres of land that do not require a designation or zone change but are counted toward the County’s RHNA. For the purposes of the analysis, the housing sites will be categorized in the following way: • Residential Sites with Increasing Allowable Density: Shown in Table 1, Residential Sites with Increasing Allowable Density, these sites are currently designated for residential uses and are proposed to be redesignated to accommodate increased residential densities. This category encompasses approximately 473 acres across 330 parcels. Maximum buildout of these sites result in 15,572 residential units. The sites in this category correspond to those in Table B in Appendix A of the draft Housing Element Update. • Non-Residential Sites Proposed to Allow Residential Units: Shown in Table 2, Non- Residential Sites Proposed to Allow Residential Units, these sites are currently designated for a variety of non-residential uses and are proposed to be redesignated to allow residential uses. This category encompasses approximately 86 acres across 46 parcels. Maximum buildout of these sites under their new designations would result in 4,053 residential units. The sites in this category correspond to those in Table B in Appendix A of the draft Housing Element Update. • Suitably Designated/Zoned Sites: Shown in Table 3, these are sites in the Housing Element sites inventory that are do not require a designation or zone change to contribute to the County’s RHNA. This category includes 153 parcels that encompass a combined approximate 92 acres. Maximum buildout of these sites is 791 residential units. The sites in this category correspond to those in Table A in Appendix A of the draft Housing Element Update. As shown in Tables 1 through 3, each site’s “proposed maximum allowable units” assumes that the entire acreage of the site will be developed at its maximum allowable density. This was calculated by multiplying the acreage of the site by its proposed maximum allowable density. This scenario is highly conservative as it is unlikely that 100 percent of the sites would be developed at 100 percent of their allowed capacity. The proposed Housing Element Update used a different methodology to calculate the unit allocation of each site for the purposes of the County’s RHNA. The “realistic capacity” used in the proposed Housing Element was based on a variety of assumptions including current and historic development trends in the County and the units contributed by current development applications (see page 155 of the draft Housing Element, for more details). For purposes of this EIR, full development of the properties at the allowable density is assumed. The location of all parcels affected by the proposed project is shown on Figures 2 through 20. It should also be noted that this project will not change the land use designations or zoning of any of the parcels in Tables 1 through 3, as this action will occur with the larger General Plan Update that is already in progress and will have its own EIR. However, this EIR will evaluate the sites using the proposed general plan land use designations as currently under consideration. An objective of this project is to publicly review the list of sites to determine if there are significant environmental impacts that would affect any future change in designation or density. Development under the Housing Element Update would be located within the Urban Limit Line and comply with the 65/35 Standard, which limits urban development to no more than 35 percent of the land area of the County, preserving the remaining 65 percent for agriculture, open space, wetlands, parks, and other non-urban uses. The update to the Contra Costa County General Plan and Zoning Ordinance is underway (https://envisioncontracosta2040.org/) but will not be complete before the housing element adoption deadline of January 2023. Therefore, because it is not known for certain which of the sites shown in Tables 1 and 2 will be redesignated to meet the RHNA, the County is preparing this EIR to evaluate the cumulative impacts of all the sites in Tables 1 through 3 at a programmatic level. Additional information regarding the Housing Element Update can be found on the County’s website: https://www.contracosta.ca.gov/8525/Housing-Element-Update.

Contact Information

Name
Daniel Barrios
Agency Name
Contra Costa County Department of Conservation and Development
Job Title
Senior Planner
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Alamo, Antioch, Brentwood, Byron, Clayton, Concord, Danville, El Cerrito, Hercules, Lafayette, Martinez, Moraga, Oakley, Orinda, Pinole, Pittsburg, Pleasant Hill, Richmond, San Pablo, San Ramon, Walnut Creek
Counties
Contra Costa
Regions
Unincorporated
Zip
94553
State Highways
I-80, I-680, CA-4, CA-24
Railways
BNSF, Union Pacific
Airports
Buchanan Field, Byron Airport
Waterways
Sacramento River Delta, San Pablo Bay, San Francisco Bay
Other Location Info
Unincorporated county-wide

Notice of Completion

State Review Period Start
State Review Period End
State Reviewing Agencies
California Air Resources Board (ARB), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Marin Region 7 (CDFW), California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection (CAL FIRE), California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD), California Department of Parks and Recreation, California Department of Transportation, District 4 (DOT), California Department of Transportation, Division of Aeronautics (DOT), California Department of Transportation, Division of Transportation Planning (DOT), California Department of Water Resources (DWR), California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (OES), California Natural Resources Agency, California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Francisco Bay Region 2 (RWQCB), California State Lands Commission (SLC), Central Valley Flood Protection Board, Delta Protection Commission, Delta Stewardship Council, Department of Toxic Substances Control, Office of Historic Preservation, San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission (BCDC), State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Drinking Water, District 4, State Water Resources Control Board, Division of Water Quality, California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bay Delta Region 3 (CDFW), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Sacramento Region 5 (RWQCB)
State Reviewing Agency Comments
California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC), California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Bay Delta Region 3 (CDFW), California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Central Valley Sacramento Region 5 (RWQCB)
Development Types
Residential (6th Cycle Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA))(Units 7610, Acres 1304)
Local Actions
General Plan Element
Project Issues
Aesthetics, Agriculture and Forestry Resources, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Coastal Zone, Cultural Resources, Cumulative Effects, Drainage/Absorption, Energy, Fiscal Impacts, Flood Plain/Flooding, Geology/Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Growth Inducement, Hazards & Hazardous Materials, Hydrology/Water Quality, Land Use/Planning, Mandatory Findings of Significance, Noise, Public Services, Recreation, Schools/Universities, Septic System, Sewer Capacity, Solid Waste, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, Utilities/Service Systems, Vegetation, Wetland/Riparian, Wildfire
Local Review Period Start
Local Review Period End

Attachments

Draft Environmental Document [Draft IS, NOI_NOA_Public notices, OPR Summary Form, Appx,]
Notice of Completion [NOC] Transmittal form

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. You may also contact the OPR via email at state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov or via phone at (916) 445-0613. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV Download All Attachments New Search Print