La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel improvement Project (Permit No. 19569)
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2020080551
- Lead Agency
- Turlock Irrigation District
- Document Title
- La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel improvement Project (Permit No. 19569)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 4/2/2021
- Document Description
- Approval of Permit No. 19569, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control, within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8):To resurface 3,000 feet of an existing bedrock sluice channel with shotcrete; install a diversion structure including eighty (80) linear feet of a 54-inch diameter rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe with reinforced concrete inlet and discharge structures; and temporary river cofferdam. The structure will connect the upstream tailrace channel to the main river channel.
- Contact Information
-
James Herota
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Responsible Agency
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 574-0651
james.herota@cvflood.ca.gov
Location
- Cities
- La Grange Turlock
- Counties
- Stanislaus
- Waterways
- Toulomne River
- Other Location Info
- Left (east) bank of the Toulomne River, 1 mile east of La Grange, Stanislaus
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- County Clerk
- Stanislaus
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170, Sacramento, CA 95821
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes