La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel improvement Project (Permit No. 19569)
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2020080551
Lead Agency
Turlock Irrigation District
Document Title
La Grange Sluice and Tailrace Channel improvement Project (Permit No. 19569)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
4/2/2021
Document Description
Approval of Permit No. 19569, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control, within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8):To resurface 3,000 feet of an existing bedrock sluice channel with shotcrete; install a diversion structure including eighty (80) linear feet of a 54-inch diameter rubber gasketed reinforced concrete pipe with reinforced concrete inlet and discharge structures; and temporary river cofferdam. The structure will connect the upstream tailrace channel to the main river channel.
Contact Information
Name
James Herota
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
La Grange, Turlock
Counties
Stanislaus
Waterways
Toulomne River
Other Location Info
Left (east) bank of the Toulomne River, 1 mile east of La Grange, Stanislaus
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Stanislaus
Final Environmental Document Available at
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170, Sacramento, CA 95821
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes