State Route 37 Sears Point to Mare Island Improvement Project

8 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2020070226
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 4 (DOT)
Document Title
State Route 37 Sears Point to Mare Island Improvement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/13/2023
Document Description
Reconfigure the existing SR 37 highway lanes from west of the SR 121 intersection to the Walnut Ave Overcrossing at Mare Island. The project would widen the Tolay Creek Bridge; have four lanes (two full-time lanes in each direction); have 8-foot shoulders (except at Sonoma Creek Bridge, which would have 4-foot shoulders); and would widen the Sonoma Creek Bridge. In each direction, the existing lane would be converted to a full-time HOV lane and the added lane would be a toll lane.

Contact Information

Name
Cody Ericksen
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 4
Job Title
Senior Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency / Project Applicant

Name
Maxwell Lammert
Agency Name
Caltrans District 4
Job Title
Office Chief of Environmental Analysis
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Name
Brooklyn Klepl
Agency Name
Caltrans District 4
Job Title
Acting Senior Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Counties
Napa, Solano, Sonoma
Regions
Countywide, San Francisco Bay Area
Cross Streets
SR 37 between SR 121 and the Mare Island Interchange
State Highways
State Route 37
Railways
Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit
Waterways
Tolay Creek, Sonoma Creek, Napa River
Other Location Info
Along approximately 10 miles of SR 37, from post mile 2.9-6.2 in Sonoma County, post mile 0.0-R7.4 in Solano County, and post mile 0.0-0.2 in Napa County

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 4
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Attachments

Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.

Download CSV Download All Attachments New Search Print