Permit No. 2316-1: James Bypass Bridge Replacement Project

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2019129056
Lead Agency
Fresno County
Document Title
Permit No. 2316-1: James Bypass Bridge Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/23/2020
Project Applicant
County of Fresno

Document Description
Approval of Permit No.2316-1, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6 for work within an adopted plan of flood control to replace the two Manning Avenue bridges within the James Bypass Designated Floodway and place Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) overlay, approximately 790 feet, on Manning Avenue linking the James Bypass East and West Overflow Channels. The proposed replacement involves constructing approximately 180 feet long by 44 feet wide 3-span precast slab bridge over the West James Bypass Overflow Channel; and constructing 70 feet long by 44 feet wide single span precast slab bridge over the East James Bypass Overflow Channel.

Contact Information
Jennifer Stewart
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821

Phone : (916) 574-1719
jennifer.stewart@cvflood.ca.gov

Location

Counties
Fresno
Other Location Info
The project is located where Manning Avenue crosses James Bypass, approximately 3 miles east of the town of San Joaquin, in Fresno County.

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
The environmental document is available to the general public at the lead agency's office. The Board's administrative record of proceedings related to the encroachment permit is available for public review at the Board's office. Please note, the NOD is not attached. If you would like to request a signed copy of the NOD, please contact Board staff at: questions@cvflood.ca.gov.

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search Print