Permit No. 19525: Randall Grimmius - Biogas Upgrading Facility

SCH Number: 2019129014
Lead Agency: Kings County
Document Title: Permit No. 19525: Randall Grimmius - Biogas Upgrading Facility
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 10/6/2020
Posted: 10/6/2020

Document Description: Approval of Permit No. 19525, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control: To construct a biogas upgrading facility to connect to an existing dairy farm’s anaerobic digesters via an 8-inch diameter low pressure biogas pipeline. Facility features also include: a perimeter fence and gates, facility access road, and a point of receipt area. The fence encloses above-ground mechanical equipment, tanks, and seatrains housed on concrete foundations.

Contact Information: Itzia Rivera
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Lead/Public Agency
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 480-5388
itzia.rivera@cvflood.ca.gov; Randall Grimmius
Project Applicant

Cities: Community of Guernsey
Counties: Kings
Other Location Info: The project is located along the east bank of Cross Creek, approximately 0.25 miles south of the intersection of Kansas Avenue and 6th Avenue and 4.25 miles east of the Community of Guernsey, in Kings County.

Final Environmental Document Available at: The environmental document is available to the general public at the lead agency's office. The Board's administrative record of proceedings related to the encroachment permit is available for public review at the Board's office. Please note, the NOD is not attached. If you would like to request a signed copy of the NOD, please contact Board staff at: questions@cvflood.ca.gov.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes