El Dorado to Clinton Rehabilitation
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019090216
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 6
(DOT)
Document Title
El Dorado to Clinton Rehabilitation
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
5/22/2024
Document Description
Remove the existing lanes and shoulders and replace them with continuously reinforced concrete pavement. Between the start of the project, PM 21.2, and just south of the McKinley Avenue undercrossing, the project will widen the median to 46 feet. Between the McKinley Avenue undercrossing to PM 24.4, the project will widen the median to 22 feet. The project will construct new auxiliary lanes on the northbound and southbound side of SR 99 within Department right-of-way. In addition, auxiliary lanes would be constructed between Stanislaus ramps and the SR 99/SR 180 junction, SR 99/SR 180 junction and Olive Avenue ramp, and Olive Avenue ramps and Clinton Avenue ramps. The auxiliary lanes would be constructed within Department right-of-way, in Fresno County.
Contact Information
Name
Cherry Zamora
Agency Name
California Transportation Commission
Job Title
Associate Deputy Director
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Counties
Fresno
Regions
Northern California
State Highways
State Route 99
Other Location Info
State Route (SR) 99 from postmile (PM) 21.2 to PM 24.4, in Fresno County.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California Transportation Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Fresno
Final Environmental Document Available at
Caltrans District 6, 2015 East Shields Avenue, Suite 100, Fresno, CA 93726
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes (Addendum)
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Attachments
Notice of Determination
Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.