BigBeau Solar Project by BigBeau Solar, LLC/EDF Renewables Development, Inc.
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2019071059
- Lead Agency
- Kern County
- Document Title
- BigBeau Solar Project by BigBeau Solar, LLC/EDF Renewables Development, Inc.
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 8/21/2020
- Present Land Use
- School lands approximately 13 miles southeast of the city of Tehachapi and approximately 2 miles northwest of the unincorporated community of Rosamond in Kern County.
- Document Description
- The proposed project would facilitate the development of 128 megawatts (MW) of renewable electrical energy and/or energy storage capacity and up to 60 MW of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on approximately 2,285 acres of land, both publicly and privately-owned, across 196 parcels. The State Lands Commission action will approve activities on a 160-acre of School Lands Parcel. The State Lands Commission action is an approval of a 30-year General Lease – Industrial Use to BigBeau Solar, LLC, Inc through August 19, 2060.
- Contact Information
-
Christopher Huitt
CA State Lands Commission
Lead/Public Agency
100 Howe Ave, Suite 100 South
Sacramento, CA 95825
Phone : (916) 574-2080
christopher.huitt@slc.ca.gov -
BigBeau Solar, LLC
Project Applicant
Location
- Counties
- Kern
- Regions
- Southern California
- Total Acres
- 122
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- State Lands Comission
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- https://psbweb.co.kern.ca.us/UtilityPages/Planning/EIRS/Big_Beau_Solar_Project/DEIR/BigBeau_Solar_Project_DEIR_Vol1_Chapters1-10.pdf
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- Yes
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes