BigBeau Solar Project by BigBeau Solar, LLC/EDF Renewables Development, Inc.

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2019071059
Lead Agency
Kern County
Document Title
BigBeau Solar Project by BigBeau Solar, LLC/EDF Renewables Development, Inc.
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/21/2020
Project Applicant
BigBeau Solar, LLC
Present Land Use
School lands approximately 13 miles southeast of the city of Tehachapi and approximately 2 miles northwest of the unincorporated community of Rosamond in Kern County.

Document Description
The proposed project would facilitate the development of 128 megawatts (MW) of renewable electrical energy and/or energy storage capacity and up to 60 MW of a Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) on approximately 2,285 acres of land, both publicly and privately-owned, across 196 parcels. The State Lands Commission action will approve activities on a 160-acre of School Lands Parcel. The State Lands Commission action is an approval of a 30-year General Lease – Industrial Use to BigBeau Solar, LLC, Inc through August 19, 2060.

Contact Information
Christopher Huitt
CA State Lands Commission
100 Howe Ave, Suite 100 South
Sacramento, CA 95825

Phone : (916) 574-2080
Fax : (916) 574-1885
christopher.huitt@slc.ca.gov

Location

Counties
Kern
Regions
Southern California
Total Acres
122

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
State Lands Comission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://psbweb.co.kern.ca.us/UtilityPages/Planning/EIRS/Big_Beau_Solar_Project/DEIR/BigBeau_Solar_Project_DEIR_Vol1_Chapters1-10.pdf

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search Print