Permit No. 16323-1 - City of Davis - South Fork Preserve Public Accessibility Improvements
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2019019011
Lead Agency
City of Davis
Document Title
Permit No. 16323-1 - City of Davis - South Fork Preserve Public Accessibility Improvements
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/1/2020
Document Description
Approval of Permit No. 16323-1, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control: To upgrade approximately 650 feet of existing pedestrian/bike trail and install approximately 2,500 feet of new pedestrian/bike trail as part of the public accessibility improvement in the Putah Creek South Fork Preserve. The proposed improvements also include constructing approximately 660-square-foot viewing deck with a 5-foot-wide boardwalk; installing benches, picnic tables, and upgrading an existing parking lot.
Contact Information
Name
Itzia Rivera
Agency Name
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
City of Davis
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Cities
Davis
Counties
Yolo
Other Location Info
The project is located at the Mace Boulevard crossing over Putah Creek, approximately 1.4 miles south from the intersection of Mace Boulevard and Montgomery Avenue, south east of the City of Davis, in Yolo County.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes