Chevron Horizontal Directional Drill 3 (HDD3) Pipeline Replacement Project

2 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2018122022
Lead Agency
California State Lands Commission
Document Title
Chevron Horizontal Directional Drill 3 (HDD3) Pipeline Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/4/2019
Present Land Use
Marsh protection

Document Description
Chevron Pipe Line Company is proposing to address anomalies in a portion of the 8-inch Pittsburg-to-Sacramento lateral pipeline that traverses an area primarily within Suisun Marsh from Grizzly Island Road to Birds Landing Road in Solano County. To eliminate these anomalies and reduce the potential for impacts from future maintenance and repairs in Suisun Marsh, CPL would replace an approx 2.5-mile pipeline segment with a new segment of the same diameter as the existing pipe. The project area would have two entry points from which the drilling would occur, located at the Birds Landing Work Site and Grizzly Island Work Site. The State Lands Commission action is a Lease Amendment of a 25-year General Lease - Right-of-Way Use through October 12, 2041.

Contact Information
Marlene Schroeder
California State Lands Commission
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

Phone : (916) 574-1900

Location

Cities
Suisun City
Counties
Solano
Cross Streets
Grizzly Island Rd
Zip
94585
Railways
Freight/Commuter
Schools
Shore Acres ES
Waterways
Montezuma Slough

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
100 Howe Ave., Suite 100-South, Sacramento, CA 95825

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search