Concurrence of Modified Solid Waste Facility Permit San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill Facility No. 36-AA-0087
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2018091031
- Lead Agency
- San Bernardino County
- Document Title
- Concurrence of Modified Solid Waste Facility Permit San Timoteo Sanitary Landfill Facility No. 36-AA-0087
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 12/30/2020
- Document Description
- Proposed project includes: Updating the design capacity from 22,685,785 million cubic yards to 23,685,785 million cubic yards; Allowing operational changes related to the use of processed green material as alternative daily cover (ADC), handling and processing of green waste materials, and chipping and grinding activities on site; And allowing the addition of the use of processed construction and demolition materials as ADC.
- Contact Information
-
Theodore Tasiopoulos
CalRecycle
Lead/Public Agency
1001 I Street
Sacramento, CA 95812
Phone : (916) 341-6084
theodore.tasiopoulos@calrecycle.ca.gov -
County of San Bernardino Solid Waste Management Division
Project Applicant
Location
- Cities
- Redlands
- Counties
- San Bernardino
- Cross Streets
- 31 Refuse Road
- Zip
- 92373
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CalRecycle
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 2018091031
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No