R649, R700, and R707 Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline 131 Replacement Projects Draft IS/MND
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018062074
Lead Agency
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 3
(CDFW)
Document Title
R649, R700, and R707 Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline 131 Replacement Projects Draft IS/MND
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/28/2018
Present Land Use
resource management and a large parcel ag
Document Description
PG&E would replace approximately 5 miles of their Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline 131 in Alameda County north of the City of Livermore. The sections of L131 that require replacement are located between Interstate 580, immediately east of Isabel Aenue and extending northeat to Vasco rd. The overall L131 replacement project is composed of three separate pipeline segments, all of which are located in the same area and require replacement. The three segments are 1) R649 - would replace two short segments of L131, 2) R700 would replace an approximately 4-mile segment of L131, and 3) R707 would replace an approximately 1-mile segmemt of L131.
Contact Information
Name
Serge Glushkoff
Agency Name
California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Region 3
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Livermore
Counties
Alameda
Cross Streets
I-580, east of Isabel Ave and northeast of Vasco Rd
Total Acres
139.4
Airports
Livermore Municipal
Schools
Las Positas CC and ES
Waterways
Cayetano Crk
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.