Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project
7 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018062002
Lead Agency
East Bay Regional Parks District
Document Title
Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/6/2022
Present Land Use
EBRPD acquired undeveloped land (previously agricultural/ open space).
Document Description
State Coastal Conservancy NOD for Coyote Hills Restoration and Public Access Project as a Responsible Agency. On May 5, 2022, SCC authorized a grant for construction of the restoration project. Restoration activities will include restoring wetland and riparian habitat and installing interpretive panels on 159-acres of the Coyote Hills Regional Park in the City of Fremont, Alameda County.
Contact Information
Name
Shalini Kannan
Agency Name
California State Coastal Conservancy
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Name
Karla Cuero
Agency Name
East Bay Regional Park District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Fremont
Counties
Alameda
Regions
San Francisco Bay Area
Zip
94555
Other Location Info
Park expansion east of the existing Coyote Hills Regional Park and west of Paseo Padre Parkway.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
California State Coastal Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Alameda
Final Environmental Document Available at
https://www.ebparks.org/about/planning/ and East Bay Regional Park District Offices: 2950 Peralta Oaks CT, Oakland, CA 94605
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes