Concurrence in the Issuance of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Edom Hill Compost in Riverside County, SWIS No. 33-AA-0376
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2018061053
- Lead Agency
- City of Cathedral City
- Document Title
- Concurrence in the Issuance of a New Solid Waste Facilities Permit for Edom Hill Compost in Riverside County, SWIS No. 33-AA-0376
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 1/26/2021
- Document Description
- The proposed new SWFP will allow for the following: composting facility that will receive green waste, food waste, and wood waste; permitted hours for receipt of incoming material will be Monday through Sunday, 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., permitted hours for material processing will be Monday through Sunday, 5:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., permitted hours for ancillary operation will be Monday through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., and permitted hours for maintenance/internal operations will be Monday through Sunday, 24 hours; permitted maximum tonnage will be 500 tons per day; permitted traffic volume will be 336 vehicles per day; permitted acreage will be 20 acres; and design capacity will be 38,168 cubic yards.
- Contact Information
-
Theodore Tasiopoulos
Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Lead/Public Agency
1001 I Street P.O. BOX 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Phone : (916) 341-6084
theodore.tasiopoulos@calrecycle.ca.gov -
Burrtec Waste Industries, Inc.
Project Applicant
Location
- Cities
- Cathedral City
- Counties
- Riverside
- Regions
- Citywide Southern California
- Other Location Info
- Site address: 67780 Edom Hill Road, Cathedral City, CA 92235
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CalRecycle
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- https://www2.calrecycle.ca.gov/SolidWaste/SiteDocument/GetDocument/362266?siteID=5594
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- Yes
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No