Toro Creek Bridge Geotechnical Survey Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0148-R4)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2018041072
Lead Agency
Caltrans 5 (San Luis Obispo) (California Department of Transportation, District 5)
Document Title
Toro Creek Bridge Geotechnical Survey Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0148-R4)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/31/2018
Present Land Use
M-2, Coastal dependent industrial/ESH, Environmentally sensitive habitat

Document Description
CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-148-R4, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, Caltrans. Project involves advancing three 100-foot deep geotechnical borings through the northbound lanes of SR 1 roadway at and near where it crosses over Toro Creek. One will be bored through the roadway and bridge deck into the creek bed, and other two will be bored through the roadway into the soils just outside the creek approaching the bridge from both directions. All three borings will be advanced using a truck-mounted drill rig employing the punch-core rotary wash drilling method. Soils data will be collected from the three borings for use evaluating the density, strength, and liquefaction potential of the underlying soils. The soils data will inform the design of a planned replacement bridge.

Contact Information
Steve Hulbert
CDFW
1234 E. Shaw Ave.
Fresno, CA 93710

Phone : 559-243-4014 x289

Location

Cities
Morro Bay
Counties
San Luis Obispo
Cross Streets
Toro Creek
Zip
93443
State Highways
1
Waterways
Toro Creek

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
1234 E. Shaw Ave., Fresno, C A93710

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search