Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration Phillips 66 Line 200 Anomaly Investigation and Repair, Winter 2018

6 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2018032056
Lead Agency
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy
Document Title
Addendum to Mitigated Negative Declaration Phillips 66 Line 200 Anomaly Investigation and Repair, Winter 2018
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received

Document Description
Conduct anomaly investigation and repairs at twenty-seven district dig locations to address a total of forty-two anomalies along the existing Line 200 Mainline trunk pipeline in eastern Contra Costa County. The P66 Line 200 pipeline transports crude oil from Kern County to the P66 refinery in Rodeo, CA. This pipeline is regulated by the Federal Department of Transportation, Resource and Special Programs Administration's Office of Pipeline Safety pursuant to 49 CFR, Part 195.452, which requires P66 to conduct regular inspections and maintenance on its pipeline. This project will allow P66 to conduct needed inspection and maintenance actions on Line 200 to maintain its structural integrity. The twenty-seven digs cover forty-two anomalies (eirght of the digs address multiple anomalies) and will temporary impacts to relatively small work ranging from approx. 0.028 acres, to approx. 0.082 acres.

Contact Information
Nicholas White
Contra Costa County
Dept. of Conservation and Development 30 Muir Road
Martinez, CA 94553

916-674-7205

Location

Coordinates
37°51'13.33"N 121°47'6.06"W
Cities
Antioch Byron Clayton
Counties
Contra Costa
Total Acres
1.5
Parcel #
various

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
30 Muir Road, Martinez, CA 94553

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Download CSV New Search