Phillips 66 Line 200 Anomaly Invetigation and Repair, Winter 2018
6 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018032056
Lead Agency
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy
Document Title
Phillips 66 Line 200 Anomaly Invetigation and Repair, Winter 2018
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
6/7/2018
Present Land Use
A-2, A-3, A-4/AL, PR
Document Description
Phillips 66 Pipeline, LLC is proposing to conduct anomaly investigation and repairs at twenty seven distinct dig locations to address a total of 42 anomalies along the existing Line 200 Mainline trunk pipeline in eastern Contra Costa County. The P66 Line 200 pipeline transports crude oil from Kern County to the P66 refinery in Rodeo, CA. This pipeline is regulated by the federal DOT, Resource and Special Programs Administration's Office of Pipeline Safety pursuant to 49 CFR, Part 195.452, which requires P66 to conduct regular inspections and maintenance on its pipeline. This project will allow P66 to conduct needed inspection and maintenance actions on Line 200 to maintain its structural integrity. The 27 digs cover 42 anomalies and will involve temporary impacts to small work areas ranging from approx.. 0.028 areas, to approx.. 0.082 acres.
Contact Information
Name
Allison Cloney
Agency Name
East Contra Costa County Habitat Conservancy
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Cities
Antioch, Byron, Clayton
Counties
Contra Costa
Total Acres
1.5
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
East Contra Costa County Habitat conservancy
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.