Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for Recology Hay Road, SWIS No. 48-AA-0002
11 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2018032031
Lead Agency
Solano County Department of Resource Management
Document Title
Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for Recology Hay Road, SWIS No. 48-AA-0002
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/13/2021
Document Description
The revised permit includes:
1. An increase in the permitted daily tonnage for disposal from 2,400 tons per day to 3,200 tons per day averaged over 7 days and a peak of 3,400 tons per day.
2. An increase to the permitted disposal area from 256 acres to 280 acres with no change to the total permitted area of 640 acres.
3. An increase to the design capacity from 37,000,000 cubic yards to 42,139,000 cubic yards; and
4. Disposal of friable asbestos in all disposal modules except disposal module 2.1.
Contact Information
Name
Harprit Mattu
Agency Name
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Job Title
Environmental Scientist
Contact Types
Responsible Agency
Phone
Name
Greg Pryor
Agency Name
Recology Hay Road, Inc.
Job Title
General Manager
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Phone
Email
Location
Cities
Vacaville
Counties
Solano
Regions
Northern California
Zip
95687
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle)
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
County Clerk
Solano
Final Environmental Document Available at
CalRecycle, 1001 I Street, PO Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes