ACE Extension Lathrop to Ceres/Merced

12 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2018012014
Lead Agency
San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission
Document Title
ACE Extension Lathrop to Ceres/Merced
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/7/2018
Present Land Use
within UPRR row from Lathrop to Ceres/Merced & some areas outside ROW for stations & layovers
Document Description
To enhance intercity and commuter rail service and to promote greater transit connectivity between the Central Valley and the Bay Area, SJRRC is proposing to expand ACE service to Ceres and Merced. Physical Improvements would include addition of station, parking and key track/infrastructure improvements and commencement of initial service of expansion of existing trains, construction of additional track improvements, such as the addition of a new main track, at specific areas of train congestion, and possibly additional parking improvement necessary because of increased ridership, which would allow further expansion of service beyond the initial service.

Contact Information

Name
Kevin Sheridan
Agency Name
San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Ceres, Lathrop, Merced
Counties
Merced, San Joaquin, Stanislaus
State Highways
I-5, SR 120, 99
Railways
UPRR, BNSF
Airports
MOD, MER, MCE
Schools
Many
Waterways
Stanislaus, Tuolumne, Merced Rivers & irrigation canals

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. You may also contact the OPR via email at state.clearinghouse@opr.ca.gov or via phone at (916) 445-0613.

Download CSV New Search Print