StanCOG 2018 regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2017122057
Lead Agency
Stanislaus Council of Governments
Document Title
StanCOG 2018 regional Transportation Plan (RTP) and Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/22/2018
Present Land Use
Multiple as this project is an update of the 2014 RTP/SCS and includes various land use and zoning designations
Document Description
The2018 RTP/SCs is a long range planning document required by both state and federal law that will guide the development of transportation improvements throughout Stanislaus County. The 2018 RTP/SCS contains a compilation of the transportation system improvement projects proposed by StanCOG, as the state-designated RTPA for the county. The 2018 RTP/SCS includes the SCS pursuant to the requirements of SB 375. Accordingly, the 2018 RTP/SCS identifies transportation improvement projects and a land use scenario that would effectively meet SB 375 GHGe requirements.

Contact Information

Name
Elisabeth Hahn
Agency Name
Stanislaus Council of Governments
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Ceres, Ceres, Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Riverbank, ..., Hughson, Modesto, Newman, Oakdale, Patterson, Riverbank, Turlock, Waterford
Counties
Stanislaus
Regions
Countywide
Cross Streets
Multiple
Parcel #
Multiple
State Highways
132, 165, 33, 99, 219, 120
Airports
Multiple
Schools
Multiple
Waterways
Multiple

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
Stanislaus Council of Governments
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print