Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Rialto BioEnergy, LLC, SWIS Number 36-AA-0446

SCH Number: 2017091011
Lead Agency: Rialto, City of (City of Rialto)
Document Title: Concurrence in the issuance of a Revised Solid Waste Facilities Permit (SWFP) for the Rialto BioEnergy, LLC, SWIS Number 36-AA-0446
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 10/6/2020
Posted: 10/6/2020
Project Applicant: Rialto BioEnergy Facility C/O Anaergia Services

Document Description: The proposed permit will allow for the following: removal of the inactive transfer/processing activity and addition of the in-vessel digestion activity; the acceptance of a maximum of 1,080 tons per day (tpd) of a combination of wet fraction/food waste, liquid waste, and dry dewatered wastewater treatment sludge (Cake); decrease permitted traffic volume from 83 to 47 vehicles per day; decrease the permitted area from 6.4 acres to 5.7 acres; change the facility design capacity from 1,650 cubic yards to 36,600 tons; and change the permitted hours of operation from receipt of refuse/waste: 24 hours per day, 7 days per week, 365 days per year, ancillary operations/facility operating hours: N/A to food waste and liquid waste acceptance: 5:00 a.m. – 9:00 p.m. Monday – Saturday, Cake acceptance and facility operating hours: 24 hours per day, 7 days per week.

Contact Information: Megan Emslander
CalRecycle
P.O. Box 4025
Sacramento, CA 95812-4025
Phone : (916) 341-6363
megan.emslander@calrecycle.ca.gov

Final Environmental Document Available at: This is to certify that the record of project approval by CalRecycle is available to the general public at: Custodian of Records, CalRecycle, Attn: Legal Office, 1001 I Street, P.O. Box 4025, Sacramento, CA 95812-4025

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes