Zone File ZF #2017-0046 Ramos Railroad Tentative Parcel Map
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2017082021
- Lead Agency
- Yolo County
- Document Title
- Zone File ZF #2017-0046 Ramos Railroad Tentative Parcel Map
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 2/20/2018
- Present Land Use
- railroad ROW, vacant land/none (currently an SBE site, unzoned)/industrial
- Document Description
- The project is a request for a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide undeveloped railroad property into a 3.34-acre parcel (Parcel 1) and a 5.77 acre-parcel (Parcel 2) on land designated for Industrial uses in the 2030 Countywide General Plan. Parcel 1 will likely be sold to a private party for future industrial purposes, while Parcel 2, which includes railroad right-of-way, would be retained for railroad uses. The application also includes the zoning of Parcel to the Light Industrial (I-L) zone consistent with the General Plan land use designation.
- Contact Information
-
Eric Parfrey
Yolo County community Services District
292 W. Beamer Street
Woodland, CA 95695
Phone : (530) 666-8043
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°52'58"N 121°58'07"W
- Counties
- Yolo
- Cross Streets
- County Rd 6, east of County Rd 99 W
- Zip
- 95776
- Total Acres
- 9.11
- Parcel #
- n/a (SBE site 872-57-220-10)
- State Highways
- I-5
- Railways
- UPRR
- Waterways
- Tehama Colusa Canal
- Township
- 12N
- Range
- 1W
- Section
- 15
- Base
- MD
- Other Location Info
- Dunnigan
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Yolo County Board fo Supervisors
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 292 West Beamer St., Woodland, CA
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- N/A
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- N/A