Rocklin Station (Design Review, DR2016-0006, Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit, TRE2016-0003, Tentative Parcel Map, DL2016-0003 and Conditional Use Permit, U201
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017072007
Lead Agency
City of Rocklin
Document Title
Rocklin Station (Design Review, DR2016-0006, Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit, TRE2016-0003, Tentative Parcel Map, DL2016-0003 and Conditional Use Permit, U201
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
9/5/2017
Present Land Use
vacant/planned development-commercial/retail commercial
Document Description
Project is a request for approval of a Design Review, Oak Tree Preservation Plan Permit, Conditional Use Permit and a Tentative Parcel Map to re-divide the existing four parcels into five commercial parcels and to allow the construction of a commercial center including an automotive service use, retail space, and restaurant spaces, some with drive-through window service and/or outdoor dining and associated site improvements, including parking and landscaping, and a freeway pylon sign exceeding 30 feet in height.
Contact Information
Name
David Mohlenbrok
Agency Name
City of Rocklin
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Rocklin
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
Sierra College Blvd/I-80/Schriber Way
Zip
95677
Total Acres
6.64+/-
Parcel #
045-052-015, 019, 020, 021
State Highways
I-80
Railways
UPRR
Schools
Sierra College
Waterways
Secret Ravine
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Rocklin
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.