Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA)
8 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017062055
Lead Agency
East Bay Regional Parks District
Document Title
Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve Land Use Plan Amendment (LUPA)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
11/26/2018
Present Land Use
park & open space
Document Description
This Land Use Plan Amendment for a 1,318 acre project area encompassing three sub-areas: 1) Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve, 2) Western Hills Open Space, and 3) the McCosker Parcel, along with the 240-acre Huckleberry Regional Preserve. Project recommendations include two main components: 1)McCosker sub-area creek restoration and enhancement; and 2) recreation and public access improvements. The recreation and public access improvements include six main elements: 1) improvements to existing staging areas, 2) improvements to existing park roadways, 3) bridge installation, 4) trail system expansion, 5) recreation facility development, and 6) improvements to utility infrastructure.
Contact Information
Name
Julie Bondurant
Agency Name
East Bay Regional Parks District
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Cities
Oakland, Orinda
Counties
Alameda, Contra Costa
Cross Streets
Skyline Blvd, Pinehurst Rd, Wilder Rd
Parcel #
273-010-001, -160-008, 27, 257 etc
State Highways
24
Schools
Canyon ES
Waterways
San Leandro Creek
Other Location Info
Robert Sibley Volcanic Regional Preserve
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
EBRPD
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.