Annexation of the Brainard Site to the City of Eureka
3 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2017062022
- Lead Agency
- Eureka, City of (City of Eureka)
- Document Title
- Annexation of the Brainard Site to the City of Eureka
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 2/2/2018
- Document Description
- City of Eureka submitted an application to LAFCo requesting annexation of four APNs 017-081-001, 404-141-004, 017-081-002 and portion of 404-141-003) of unincorporated land into the City, along with a portion of the Caltrans right-of-way along State Hwy 101, totaling approx. 101.1 acres in size. The parcels are directly adjacent to the City of Eureka boundary on three sides, and within the City's Sphere of Influence.
- Contact Information
-
Colette Metz
Humboldt LAFCo
1125 16th St., Suite 202
Arcata, CA 95521
Phone : (707) 445-7508
Location
- Coordinates
- 40°48'46"N 124°6'37"W
- Cities
- Eureka
- Counties
- Humboldt
- Cross Streets
- Hwy 101 between Indianola and Murray Field Airport
- Zip
- 95501
- Total Acres
- 101.1
- State Highways
- 101
- Railways
- UPRR
- Airports
- Murray Field
- Waterways
- Humboldt Bay
- Township
- 5N
- Range
- 1E
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Humboldt LAFCo
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 1125 16th St., Suite 202, Arcata, CA 95521
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes