Brainard Annexation and Local Coastal Program Prezoning Amendment
3 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017062022
Lead Agency
City of Eureka
Document Title
Brainard Annexation and Local Coastal Program Prezoning Amendment
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/10/2017
Document Description
CA Redwood Company (CRC) is proposing to annex four Assessor's parcels of unincorporated land (three parcels in their entirety and a portion of one additional parcel) into the City, along with a portion of the Caltrans right-of-way (ROW) along State Hwy 101 (Hwy 101), totaling approx. 101.1 acres in size. The parcels are directly adjacent to the City of Eureka (City) city boundary on three sides, and within the City's Sphere of Influence.
The City's Land Use Plan designates the Brainard Annexation area as General Industrial (GI) and although changes may be made during the General Plan update to designate the Railroad and Caltrans rights-of-way as Public/Quasi-Public (PQP), no changes are proposed to the land use at this time.
Pre-zoning is required to assign the appropriate City zoning district to the area proposed for annexation. in order to pre-zone the parcels, an amendment of the Implementation Plan (IP) map of the adopted and certified Local Coastal Program (LCP) is required. The proposed IP amendment will apply General Industrial (MG) to the zoning district map for the land included in the Brainard Annexation area.
Contact Information
Name
Kristen M. Goetz
Agency Name
City of Eureka
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Eureka
Counties
Humboldt
Cross Streets
Hwy 101 between Indianola and Murray Field Airport
Zip
95501
Total Acres
101.1
State Highways
101
Railways
UPRR
Airports
Murray Field
Waterways
Humboldt Bay
Township
5N
Range
1E
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
City of Eureka
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.