Permit No. 19509: Fresno County - Sand Creek Bridge Replacement Project

SCH Number: 2017061045
Lead Agency: Fresno County
Document Title: Permit No. 19509: Fresno County - Sand Creek Bridge Replacement Project
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 11/20/2020
Posted: 11/20/2020
Project Applicant: Fresno County Department of Public Works and Planning (Fresno County)

Document Description: Approval of Permit No. 19509, under California Code of Regulations, Title 23, Article 3, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control: To remove and replace the existing 23 feet wide and 31 feet long, two-lane Sand Creek Bridge located on the Ennis Road with a new 26 feet 10 inches wide and 101 feet long two-lane bridge that meets the current standards.

Contact Information: Itzia Rivera
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
3310 El Camino Avenue, Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 480-5388
itzia.rivera@cvflood.ca.gov

Counties: Fresno
Other Location Info: The project is located on Ennis Road over Sand Creek, about 4.4 miles southeast of State Route 180 in Fresno County.

Final Environmental Document Available at: The environmental document is available to the general public at the lead agency's office. The Board's administrative record of proceedings related to the encroachment permit is available for public review at the Board's office. Please note, the NOD is not attached. If you would like to request a signed copy of the NOD, please contact Board staff at: questions@cvflood.ca.gov.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes