Feather River Aquatic Organism Passage Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0071-R2)
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2017052056
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 2 (Redding) (California Department of Transportation, District 2)
- Document Title
- Feather River Aquatic Organism Passage Project (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0071-R2)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement Number 1600-2018-0070-R2, pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project applicant, State of California Department of Transportation. The larger project scope will improve Aquatic Organism Passage of five stream conveyance structures along Highway 70 in Butte and Plumas Counties. The current project is limited to restoration and enhancement activities at two locations in Plumas County on Rush Creek and Soda Creek, both tributaries to Feather River.
- Contact Information
-
Suzanne Gilmore
CDFW, Northern Region
1701 Nimbus Rd
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
916-358-2950
Location
- Coordinates
- 39°50'37.2"N 121°23'48.6"W
- Counties
- Plumas Butte
- Cross Streets
- SR 70
- Zip
- 95965
- Total Acres
- 24.04
- State Highways
- SR 70
- Railways
- UPRR
- Waterways
- North Fork Feather River, Rush Creek, Soda Creek
- Township
- 23N
- Range
- 5E
- Section
- 14
- Base
- MDBM
- Other Information
- Post Mile 23.67 and Post Mile 31.82
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 1701 Nimbus Rd, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No