RD 2074 14-Mile Slough Levee Improvement
4 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2017052039
- Lead Agency
- Reclamation District 2074 (Reclamation District No. 2074)
- Document Title
- RD 2074 14-Mile Slough Levee Improvement
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 7/31/2018
- Present Land Use
- levee/unzoned/low density residential
- Document Description
- Approval of Permit No. 19228, under CA Code of Regulations, Title 23, Section 6 for work within an adopted plan of flood control, within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8): To construct a continuous 450 linear foot soil-cement-bentonite cutoff wall to a depth of 48 feet on the left(south) bank levee of the 14-mile Slough.
- Contact Information
-
James Herota
Central Valley Flood Protection Board
3310 El Camino Ave., Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 574-0651
Location
- Coordinates
- 37°59'38"N 121°20'58"W
- Cities
- Stockton
- Counties
- San Joaquin
- Cross Streets
- Feather River Dr
- Zip
- 95219
- Total Acres
- 0.21
- Parcel #
- 116-020-01
- State Highways
- 5
- Schools
- Tully Knoles ES
- Waterways
- 14-Mi Slough
- Township
- 2N
- Range
- 6E
- Base
- MDBM
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Flood rotection Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 3310 El Camino Ave., Suite 170, Sacramento, CA 95821
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes