SR 65 Capacity and Operational Improvements Project
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017052036
Lead Agency
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Document Title
SR 65 Capacity and Operational Improvements Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/6/2018
Present Land Use
various: community/regional commercial, business professional and employment, open space, light industrial
Document Description
Caltrans in cooperation with Placer County Transportation Planning Agency, and the cities of Roseville, Rockling, and Lincoln, proposes to widen SR 65 from north of Galleria Blvd/Stanford Ranch Rd to Lincoln Blvd. The total length of the project is 6.3 miles along SR 65. The project proposes to relieve existing mainline congestion by adding capacity to improve traffic operations and safety. The additional capacity would help planned and anticipated growth along the corridor and would help achieve the mobility and economic development goals PCTPA.
Contact Information
Name
Maggie Ritter
Agency Name
California Department of Transportation, District 3
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Address
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Cities
Lincoln, Rocklin, Roseville
Counties
Placer
Cross Streets
SR 65 from Galleria Blvd/Stanford Ranch Rd to Lincoln Blvd
Parcel #
various
State Highways
SR 65
Schools
Various
Waterways
Pleasant Grove Creek and Orchard Creek
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Caltrans
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.