Williams Creek Bridge at Powerhouse Road (10C-0166) Replacement Project
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017052019
Lead Agency
Mendocino County
Document Title
Williams Creek Bridge at Powerhouse Road (10C-0166) Replacement Project
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/14/2017
Present Land Use
various
Document Description
Mendocino County, in conjunction with the Caltrans, and the Federal Hwy Administration, is proposing to replace the Williams Creek Bridge at Powerhouse Road (10C-0166). The project proposes replacing an existing single-lane, single-span, dual railroad flatcar with timber-deck bridge structure (41 ft. long by 23 ft. wide, dual width). The existing bridge is classified as structurally deficient with a sufficiency rating of 47.6, and is eligible for replacement under the FHWA Bridge Program administered by Caltrans. The new structure will conform to Caltrans freeboard standards for 50- and 100-year flood events. The new bridge, with a clear width of 28 ft, will provide a safer structure for vehicles. Construction is planned for 2018 or later and will take approx four to five months to complete.
Contact Information
Name
John Cylwik
Agency Name
Mendocino County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
Powerhouse Rd, Gibson Lane
Zip
95469
Total Acres
1.4
Schools
Potter Valley ES/PS
Waterways
Williams Ck, Bevans Ck, E. Fk., Russian River, Bush Ck
Township
17N
Range
11W
Section
18
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Potter Valley
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
Mendocino County Board of Supervisors
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.