Amendment #6 to the UCLA 2002 Long Range Devleopment Plan for Additional On-Campus Student Housing

7 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2017051024
Lead Agency
University of California, Los Angeles
Document Title
Amendment #6 to the UCLA 2002 Long Range Devleopment Plan for Additional On-Campus Student Housing
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
1/30/2018
Present Land Use
5 sites at UCLA; parking lot (Lot 15), academic uses, vacant; stadium concourse (Drake Stadium). The UCLA campus, including the proposed housing sites, is designated as public facility in the City of Los Angeles General Plan and Zoning
Document Description
Amendment to #6 to the UCLA 2002 Long Range Development Plan (LRDP) proposes to add 1.5 million gross sq. ft. to the UCLA campus allocation for development. The proposed LRDP Amendment #6 would increase the development allocation in the Northwest, Central, Bridge, and Southwest zones thereby allowing additional development in each zone for student housing on five proposed sites.

Contact Information

Name
Tracy Dudman
Agency Name
University of California, Los Angeles
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency

Location

Cities
Los Angeles, Los Angeles, City of
Counties
Los Angeles
Cross Streets
five sites on the main campus
Zip
90095
Total Acres
~10.4
State Highways
405
Schools
Marymount HS, UCLA Lab School, Fairburn ES, etc.
Other Location Info
Westwood

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
University of California
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes

Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.

Download CSV New Search Print