South of Palermo 115 kV Power Line Reinforcement Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2017-020-02 (ITP))

11 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2017042051
Lead Agency
Public Utilities Commission (California Public Utilities Commission)
Document Title
South of Palermo 115 kV Power Line Reinforcement Project (California Endangered Species Act Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-2017-020-02 (ITP))
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
8/31/2018
Present Land Use
LU: gen ag, exclusive ag, ag/res, res, light industrial, and gen commercial uses

Document Description
The existing approx. 60-mile power transmission system is located in the western Sierras and the communities of Palermo, Honcut, Tierra Buena, Yuba City, East Marysville, Linda, Olivehurst, Plumas Lake, Rio Oso, and East Nicolaus, tranversing Yuba, Sutter, and Butte Counties. The proposed pole reinforcement project would improve reliability, ensure the system has adequate capacity to meet local needs, and be designed to accomodate future operation. The majority of the existing towers are proposed to be replaced with a combination of hybrid poles and tubular steel poles. The State Lands Commission action is an approval of a 25-year General Lease - Right - of - Way Use through August 22, 2043.

Contact Information
Marlene Schroeder
CA State Lands Commission
100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South
Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

Phone : (916) 574-1900

Location

Cities
Marysville Yuba City
Counties
Butte Sutter Yuba
Cross Streets
SR 70
Zip
95968,9590
State Highways
70
Township
12N
Range
4E
Section
21
Base
MD

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CA State Lands Commission
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final EIR Available Location
CA State Lands Commission 100 Howe Avenue, Suite 100-South Sacramento, CA 95825-8202

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search