The Grove (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0086-R2)

5 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2017032017
Lead Agency
Nevada City (City of Nevada City)
Document Title
The Grove (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0086-R2)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/2/2018
Present Land Use
medium density res-site performance-planned development (10.9 ac); high density res (2 ac)

Document Description
CDFW has executed Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0086-R2 pursuant to section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant, Robert Upton, Nevada City Tech Center, LLC. The current project design calls for removal of the two ephemeral drainages and partial impacts to the unnamed tributary for 0.021 acres impact, the ephemeral mine drainages for 0.027 acres, and a riparian vegetation impacts total 0.005 acres. The impacts will be as follows a 48" diameter HDPE culvert, 90 linear feet long, with approx. 10-12 feet of native soil fill above it, to provide for the proposed road crossing of the major drainage-Peck's Ravine. Armor will be placed at the inlet and outlet of the culvert for 10-15 feet with rip rap. The total permanent impacts will be approx. 100-120 linear feet/0.021 acres.

Contact Information
Amy Kennedy
CDFW
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Phone : (916) 358-2842

Location

Coordinates
39°15'10"N 121°2'4"W
Cities
Nevada City
Counties
Nevada
Cross Streets
Providence Mine Rd
Zip
95959
Total Acres
19.57
Parcel #
05-190-53
State Highways
49
Schools
Sear Creek ES
Waterways
Deer Creek
Township
16N
Range
8E
Section
13
Base
MDBM

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
1701 Nimbus Road, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search