Use Permit Amendment 27-94A2
2 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2017012002
Lead Agency
Shasta County
Document Title
Use Permit Amendment 27-94A2
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
2/22/2017
Present Land Use
PLU: Residential and horse boarding; Z: Limited ag; GP: Part time AG
Document Description
Project site is located in the Palo Cedro area on a 7-acre parcel on the west side of Deschutes Road, about 0.2 miles south of the intersection of Deschutes Road and Brundage Road (8502 Deschutes Road). The request is for approval of an amendment to Use Permit 27-94. This amendment would change the facility from a covered horse riding arena and boarding stable for up to 32 horses to primarily an equestrian training facility with up to two or three competition "dressage" style events per year, with as many as 40 people and 20 horses on site during these events. The covered riding arena would be lengthened by 90 feet, and an office and covered viewing area would be added. The boarding facility would be reduced to 6 horses.
Contact Information
Name
Richard Simon
Agency Name
Shasta County
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Coordinates
Counties
Shasta
Cross Streets
Deschutes Rd and Brundage Rd
Zip
96073
Total Acres
7
Parcel #
058-460-022
State Highways
44
Schools
Junction, Redding Christian, Crysalis
Waterways
Cow Creek
Township
31N
Range
3W
Section
18
Base
MDBM
Other Location Info
Palo Cedro
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of Shasta
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Disclaimer: The document was originally posted before CEQAnet had the capability to host attachments for the public. To obtain the original attachments for this document, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above.