Lower Klamath Project License Surrender and Decommissioning

10 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016122047
Lead Agency
State Water Resources Control Board
Document Title
Lower Klamath Project License Surrender and Decommissioning
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
12/2/2022
Document Description
The Project involves the decommissioning and removal of the Project dams (J.C. Boyle, Copco No. 1, Copco No. 2, and Iron Gate) and associated facilities by the Klamath River Renewal Cooperation (KRRC). The Project’s purpose is to create a free-flowing Klamath River and to provide for volitional fish passage in the Klamath River where the dams are currently located. The Project includes improving certain roads and bridges, habitat restoration of the former reservoirs and other land, replacing a water supply pipeline used by the City of Yreka, and reopening a fish hatchery. The State Water Resources Control Board is lead agency for the Project. As a responsible agency, CNRA has approval authority over two documents (Co-Licensee Agreement and Funding Implementation Agreement) that further KRRC’s implementation of the Project.

Contact Information

Name
Carlie Jackson
Agency Name
California Natural Resources Agency
Job Title
Administrative Assistant II
Contact Types
Responsible Agency

Location

Cities
Northern California
Counties
Siskiyou
Regions
Northern California
Township
47N
Range
R53
Section
9
Other Location Info
Base - Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
California Natural Resources Agency
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
N/A
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
N/A
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
N/A
Download CSV New Search Print