Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16/19; PDS2016-SP-16-002, PDS2016-GPA- 16-008, PDS2016-REZ-16-006, PDS2016-TM-5616, & PDS2016-ER-16-19-006
4 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016121042
Lead Agency
San Diego County
Document Title
Otay Ranch Village 14 and Planning Areas 16/19; PDS2016-SP-16-002, PDS2016-GPA- 16-008, PDS2016-REZ-16-006, PDS2016-TM-5616, & PDS2016-ER-16-19-006
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
7/19/2019
Document Description
The project is a General Plan Amendment (GPA), Specific Plan (SP), a Zone Reclassification (REZ), and a Tentative Map {TM). The project is a planned community consisting of 1,119 dwelling units; 10,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial; 2.3 acre joint use Fire Station/Sheriff storefront; 9. 7 acre elementary school site; 24 acres of public/private parks; 776 acres of open space and a preserve on 1,284 acres.
Contact Information
Name
Greg Mattson
Agency Name
County of San Diego Planning & Development Services
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Name
Agency Name
Jackson Pendo Development
Contact Types
Project Applicant
Location
Counties
San Diego
Regions
Unincorporated
Parcel #
597-190-23; 597-140-04,-05; 597-020-06,-10; 597-150-03,-07,-08,-12,-13; 598-010-02; 598-020-04
Other Location Info
The project site is generally located within the Proctor Valley. The property is approximately one-quarter mile east of Chula Vista and immediately south of the unincorporated community of Jamul. The project is located within the Jamul/Dulzura Subregional Plan Area and is all within the unincorporated area of San Diego County.
(APN: 06; 598-021-2; 598-070-07,-09)
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
County of San Diego
Approving Agency Role
Lead Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
Yes
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
No
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
Yes
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
Yes
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
Attachments
Notice of Determination
Disclaimer: The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research (OPR) accepts no responsibility for the content or accessibility of these documents. To obtain an attachment in a different format, please contact the lead agency at the contact information listed above. For more information, please visit OPR’s Accessibility Site.