Intersection of State Route 12 and State Route 113 Intersection Improvement Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-20

SCH Number: 2016112050
Lead Agency: Caltrans 4 (Oakland) (California Department of Transportation, District 4)
Document Title: Intersection of State Route 12 and State Route 113 Intersection Improvement Project [California Endangered Species Act (CESA) Incidental Take Permit No. 2081-20
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 7/11/2018

Document Description: This project includes construction of a single-lane roundabout at the intersection of SR 12 and SR 113. The project components consists of approach legs, splitter islands, center island, traversable apron, roadway, intersection widening, drainage system, guard rail replacement, lighting installation, constructing staging, site clean-up and restoration. The entire Project consists of a biological study area (BSA) of approx. 28 acres. The project will have 2.72 acres of temporary impacts and 0.03 acres of permanent impacts to upland Covered Species grassland habitat a result of construction. Impacts to CA tiger salamander (CTS) habitat include 0.03 acres of permanent impacts and 2.72 acres of temporary impacts to upland grassland and dispersal habitat. The project is expected to result in incidental take of the CTS, designated as a threatened species under CESA. The ITP referenced above as issued by CDFW authorizes incidental take of species listed under CESA that may occur as a result of Project implementation.

Contact Information: Robert Stanley
CDFW
2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100
Fairfield, CA 94534
707-428-2093

Approving Agency: CDFW
Approving Agency Role: Responsible Agency
Approved On: 6/28/2018
Final EIR Available Location: 2825 Cordelia Road, Suite 100, Fairfield, CA 94534

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No