Davidson Stream Crossing Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0690-R1)

SCH Number: 2016112028
Lead Agency: Mendocino County
Document Title: Davidson Stream Crossing Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0690-R1)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 5/9/2019
Posted: 5/9/2019

Document Description: The project is limited to one (1) encroachments. The encroachment is to upgrade a failing culvert. Work for this encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing culvert, replacement with new properly sized culvert, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion. Eight additional stream crossings and a pond were described but not included as projects in the notification. Not enough information was included to determine whether CDFW concurs that the stream crossings or pond do not require notification pursuant to FGC section 1602. This Agreement does not cover other jurisdictional infrastructure or activities on the property (including the additional stream crossings, or water diversion). Accordingly, the applicant must submit a separate.notification to the Department for all other applicable infrastructure or activities.

Contact Information: Angela Liebenberg
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
Phone : (707) 964-4830

Counties: Mendocino
Other Location Info: The project to be completed is located within the South Fork Eel River watershed, approximately 7 miles northwest of the town of Laytonville; County of Mendocino, State of California. The project·is located in Section 3, T22N, R1 SW, Mt. Diablo Base and Meridian; in the Tan Oak Park U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle.

Final Environmental Document Available at: 860 N. Bush Street Ukiah, CA 95482

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No