Williams Water Diversion and Road Repair Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0875-R1)

SCH Number: 2016112028
Lead Agency: Mendocino County
Document Title: Williams Water Diversion and Road Repair Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0875-R1)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 4/3/2019

Document Description: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2018-0517-R1, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Mr. Wade Williams. The project is limited to three encroachments. The first encroachment Is for water diversion from an unnamed tributary to the South Fork of the Eel River. Water is diverted for domestic use and Irrigation. Work for the water diversion will Include use and maintenance of the water diversion infrastructure. The two other proposed encroachments are to clear failing culverts. Work for these encroachments will Include the clearing of each culvert by hand. The project also includes a remediation ·plan which consists of spreading and compressing base rock to fill a ditched depression and eroded bank and construct up to three water bars to reduce sediment runoff at the bottom of the driveway. The plan also proposes the installation of up to three water bars to channel run off to the first'culvert.

Contact Information: Angela Liebenberg
CDFW
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
7079644830

Coordinates: 39.6988°'"N 123.6506°'"W
Counties: Humboldt
Parcel #: 013-380-09-00; 013-380-21-00
Township: 12N
Range: 16W
Section: 4
Base: MD B&M
Other Location Info: The project to be completed is located within the South Fork of the Eel River watershed, approximately 4 miles northwest of the town of Branscomb.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No