Harris Mill Creek Meadows Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0744-R1)
94 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016112028
- Lead Agency
- Mendocino County
- Document Title
- Harris Mill Creek Meadows Stream Crossings Project (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2018-0744-R1)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 2/5/2019
- Present Land Use
- rural residential, agriculture, resource management/All/All
- Document Description
- The project consists of three encroachments. The three proposed encroachments are to upgrade failing and undersized culverts. Work for these encroachments will include excavation, removal of failing culverts, replacement with new properly sized culverts, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion. The Notification discloses three separate wells, only one of which is in use for irrigation and domestic water. The well in use (well #3) is 180 feet deep, draws water from 65 feet and has an estimated pump rate for 60 gpm. The notification discloses a small rainwater catchment pond that is for recreation use and currently not connected to any nearby stream. Applicant plans to rock armor and mulch/seed pond outlet to reduce erosion and prevent outflow connection to nearby streams.
- Contact Information
-
John Herrera
CDFW
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
Phone : (707) 962-9044
Location
- Coordinates
- 39.001368°'"N 123.351323°'"W
- Cities
- Booneville
- Counties
- Mendocino
- Cross Streets
- 17300 Booneville Rd.,
- Zip
- 95145
- Parcel #
- 029-160-42; 029-160-52
- Waterways
- Navarro River
- Township
- 15N
- Range
- 15W
- Section
- 26
- Base
- MDB&M
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- CDFW
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 619 2nd Street, Eureka, CA 95501
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No