Medina Culvert replacement and stream restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina)
362 Documents in Project
Summary
SCH Number
2016112028
Lead Agency
Mendocino County
Document Title
Medina Culvert replacement and stream restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
10/15/2020
Document Description
The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Mr. Alex Medina.
The project is limited to 2 encroachments. The first encroachment is for removing an unpermitted micro-hydro stream alteration consisting of concrete and plastic pipe and restoring the original channel. The other proposed encroachment is to replace a failing and undersized stream crossings. Work for this encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion
Contact Information
Name
Kevin Joe
Agency Name
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
Contact Types
Lead/Public Agency
Phone
Location
Counties
Mendocino
Other Location Info
The project to be completed is located within the McDowell Creek watershed, approximately 6 miles east of the town of Hopland, County of Mendocino, State of California; in Section 24, T13N, R11W, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the Hopland, CA U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Number 050-100-02; latitude 38.9708 N and longitude – 123.0104 W at the culvert replacement and latitude 38.9708 N and longitude -123.0100 W at the stream restoration site.
Notice of Determination
Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Determinations
(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No