Medina Culvert replacement and stream restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina)

SCH Number: 2016112028
Lead Agency: Mendocino County
Document Title: Medina Culvert replacement and stream restoration (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina)
Document Type: NOD - Notice of Determination
Received: 10/15/2020
Posted: 10/15/2020

Document Description: The California Department of Fish and Wildlife has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement number 1600-2019-0390-R1_Medina, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to Mr. Alex Medina. The project is limited to 2 encroachments. The first encroachment is for removing an unpermitted micro-hydro stream alteration consisting of concrete and plastic pipe and restoring the original channel. The other proposed encroachment is to replace a failing and undersized stream crossings. Work for this encroachment will include excavation, removal of the failing crossings, replacement with new properly sized crossings, backfilling and compaction of fill, and rock armoring as necessary to minimize erosion

Contact Information: Kevin Joe
Department of Fish and Wildlife Northern Region
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501
Phone : (707) 441-2075

Counties: Mendocino
Other Location Info: The project to be completed is located within the McDowell Creek watershed, approximately 6 miles east of the town of Hopland, County of Mendocino, State of California; in Section 24, T13N, R11W, Mount Diablo Base and Meridian, in the Hopland, CA U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle; Assessor’s Parcel Number 050-100-02; latitude 38.9708 N and longitude – 123.0104 W at the culvert replacement and latitude 38.9708 N and longitude -123.0100 W at the stream restoration site.

Final Environmental Document Available at: Available to the general public at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW’s record related to the Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement is available to the public for review at CDFW’s regional office.

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment: No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project: Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project: No
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project: No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA: No