McCoy Creek Bridge Replacement (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0585-R1)

4 Documents in Project

Summary

SCH Number
2016112020
Lead Agency
Caltrans 1 (Eureka) (California Department of Transportation, District 1)
Document Title
McCoy Creek Bridge Replacement (Lake or Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0585-R1)
Document Type
NOD - Notice of Determination
Received
Posted
3/8/2018
Present Land Use
N/A

Document Description
CDFW has executed Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2017-0585-R1, pursuant to Section 1602 of the Fish and Game Code to the project Applicant. Project is limited to one encroachment to replace the McCoy Creek Bridge (Bridge No. 10-0036 at mile 17.92 on SR 271 in Mendocino County, CA. The proposed replacement bridge is a 230-foot, two-span pre-cast, pre-stressed concrete girder superstructure, supported by a drop bent cap on two round columns/shaft socketed into rock and seat-type abutments, on cast-in-drilled-hole piles. All work will be conducted above the ordinary high water mark of McCoy Creek.

Contact Information
Jennifer Olson
CDFW
619 Second Street
Eureka, CA 95501

Phone : (707) 445-5387

Location

Coordinates
39°57'14.1"N 123°46'32.8"W
Counties
Mendocino
Cross Streets
SR 271 between PM 17.7/18.0 near Ebert Lane
Zip
95587
State Highways
SR 271
Waterways
McCoy Creek
Township
24N
Range
17W
Section
6
Other Location Info
Piercy

Notice of Determination

Approving Agency
CDFW
Approving Agency Role
Responsible Agency
Approved On
Final Environmental Document Available at
619 Second St., Eureka, CA 95501

Determinations

(1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
No
(2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
Yes
(2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
(3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
Yes
(4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
N/A
(5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
No
(6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
No
Download CSV New Search