Butte & Ash Creek Bridge Replacement Project
5 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016112013
- Lead Agency
- Caltrans 2 (Redding) (California Department of Transportation, District 2)
- Document Title
- Butte & Ash Creek Bridge Replacement Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 7/9/2018
- Present Land Use
- Caltrans ROW
- Document Description
- Approval of Encroachment Permit No. 19226, under California Code Regulations, Title 23, Section 6, for work within an adopted plan of flood control under the CVFPB's jurisdiction, including within a Regulated Stream (Table 8.1; Title 23, Div. 1, Article 8). The project includes replacement of the existing Ash Creek bridge with a new three span bridge 50 feet long and 44 feet wide.
- Contact Information
-
James Herota
Central Valley Flood Protection Bd.
3310 El Camino Ave. Suite 170
Sacramento, CA 95821
Phone : (916) 574-0651
Location
- Coordinates
- 41°11'39"N 120°56'39"W
- Counties
- Modoc
- Cross Streets
- SR 299
- Zip
- 96006
- Total Acres
- 3.5
- Parcel #
- Caltrans ROW
- State Highways
- 299
- Airports
- Adin
- Schools
- Big Valley Primary
- Waterways
- Butte Creek and Ash Creek
- Township
- 39N
- Range
- 9E
- Section
- 21,28
- Other Location Info
- Adin
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Central Valley Flood Protection Board
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- 3310 El Camino Ave., Suite 170, Sacramento, CA 95821
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- N/A
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes