Haines Road at Wise Canal Bridge Replacement
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016102023
- Lead Agency
- Placer County
- Document Title
- Haines Road at Wise Canal Bridge Replacement
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Document Description
- The existing Haines Rd bridge is a single lane, single span rigid frame concrete structure that was constructed in 1930. The existing bridge is 28 ft long and 16 ft wide. The clear width of the single lane deck (between the railings) is only 13.5 ft though it serves a two lane roadway. The abutments are skewed to the roadway approximately 45 degrees, and form the sides of the Wise Canal under the bridge. The bridge replacement would be a wider, longer, single-span, precast pre-stressed voided slabs bridge on strutted abutments on essentially the same horizontal and vertical alignment as the existing bridge. The new bridge will be approximately 73 ft in length and 35.33 feet in width, with two 12 ft wide traffic lanes, two 4 ft wide shoulders, and two 1.67 ft wide bridge rails.
- Contact Information
-
Lori Perron
Placer County
3091 County Center Drive, Suite 220
Auburn, CA 95603
530-745-7598
Location
- Coordinates
- 38°57'2.37"N 121°03'6.81"W
- Cities
- Auburn
- Counties
- Placer
- Cross Streets
- 0.3 mile northwest of intersection of Bell Rd and Haines Rd
- Zip
- 95602
- Total Acres
- 3.0
- Parcel #
- 053-031-035, -072, -010-013, -010-059, 010-009
- State Highways
- I 80
- Railways
- UPRR
- Airports
- Auburn Municipal
- Schools
- Pine Hills Academy
- Waterways
- Wise Canal, Halsey Afterbay, Lake Arthur, Halsey Forebay, Lake Clemintine, American River, Dry C
- Township
- 13N
- Range
- 8E
- Section
- 26
- Base
- MD
- Other Information
- Dry Creek, Rock Creek Lake
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Placer COunty Board of Supervisors
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 3091 County Center Drive, Suite 220, Auburn, CA 95603
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes