Corrective Action Final Remedy for the Univar USA, Inc. Facility
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016101028
- Lead Agency
- Toxic Substances Control, Department of (Department of Toxic Substances Control)
- Document Title
- Corrective Action Final Remedy for the Univar USA, Inc. Facility
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 1/13/2017
- Present Land Use
- commercial/industrial
- Document Description
- The project involves selecting the final corrective action remedy to address releases of chemicals to the subsurface at the former Univar USA, Inc. site. The proposed remedy involves on-site soil vapor extraction, on-site groundwater extraction, off-site groundwater extraction, monitored natural attenuation for groundwater once active treatment ends, and on-site land use restrictions. The proposed remedy is discussed in greater detail in the CEQA initial study and other project documents including the corrective measures study report and DTSC's draft statement of basis.
- Contact Information
-
Ryan Batty
Department of Toxic Substances Control
8800 Cal Center Drive
Sacramento, CA 95826-3000
Phone : (916) 255-6424
Location
- Coordinates
- 34°00'45.44"N 118°10'53.83"W
- Cities
- Commerce Vernon
- Counties
- Los Angeles
- Cross Streets
- Noakes St an S. Bonnie Beach Place
- Zip
- 90023
- Total Acres
- 9.5
- Parcel #
- 5242-018-002, -024-009
- State Highways
- I 5, I 710
- Railways
- UP and BNSF Hobart
- Schools
- Eastman Ave ES
- Waterways
- LA River
- Township
- 2S
- Range
- 12W
- Section
- 07
- Base
- LA
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- DTSC
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 8800 Cal Center Drive, Sacramento, CA 95826
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No