Trout Creek Stream Restoration Phase II Project
2 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016092059
- Lead Agency
- Shasta Valley Resource Conservation District
- Document Title
- Trout Creek Stream Restoration Phase II Project
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 11/23/2016
- Present Land Use
- Timber Land Production
- Document Description
- The STNF in partnership with adjoining private landowners Sierra Pacific Industries and Olympic Resource Management is proposing to implement a second phase of restoration activity needed to meet objectives initially proposed in the Trout Creek Stream Restoration Project EA (2005 STNF) with a new understanding of multiple channel morphology in the Lower Trout Creek Meadow. The proposed design modification to the original 2006 Trout Creek Stream Restoration project will restore the historic hydrologic character of Trout Creek through the meadow by releasing physical constraints to floodplain waters. To effect this change back to a historical system, three principal activities are proposed as described in the IS/ND.
- Contact Information
-
Allison Lutes
Shasta Valley Resource Conservation District
215 Executive Ct., Suite A
Yreka, CA 96097
Phone : 530 842-6121 ext 106
Location
- Coordinates
- 41°26'45.1"N 121°53'43.3"W
- Counties
- Siskiyou
- Cross Streets
- USFS 43N13 and Stevens Pass Rd
- Total Acres
- 145
- Parcel #
- 018-120-040-000, 018-120-050-000
- Railways
- Abandoned
- Waterways
- Trout Creek
- Township
- 42N
- Range
- 1E
- Section
- 31
- Other Location Info
- McCloud
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- Shasta Valley Resource Conservation District
- Approving Agency Role
- Lead Agency
- Approved On
- Final EIR Available Location
- 215 Executive Courty, Suite A, Yreka, CA 96097
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2b) A Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- No
- (4) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No