Lowe Elkhorn Basin Levee Setback (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0204-R2)
11 Documents in Project
Download CSV
New Search
Print
Summary
- SCH Number
- 2016092015
- Lead Agency
- California Department of Water Resources (DWR)
- Document Title
- Lowe Elkhorn Basin Levee Setback (Streambed Alteration Agreement No. 1600-2019-0204-R2)
- Document Type
- NOD - Notice of Determination
- Received
- Posted
- 3/25/2021
- Document Description
- Amendment #2 adds an underground utility relocation project to the already approved Agreement for the Lower Elkhorn Basin Levee Setback (LEBLS) project. This project will utilize horizontal directional drilling to relocate an existing fiber optic cable line. This action has been analyzed in the LEBLS project’s EIR (SCH # 2016092015).
- Contact Information
-
Annalise Metzger
California Department of Fish and Wildlife
Responsible Agency
1701 Nimbus Road
Rancho Cordova, CA 95670
Phone : (916) 358-2885
annalise.metzger@wildlife.ca.gov
Location
- Counties
- Yolo
- Regions
- Northern California
- Township
- 9/10 N
- Range
- 3/4 E
- Other Location Info
- within the Sacramento Bypass and East Levee of the Yolo Bypass
Notice of Determination
- Approving Agency
- California Department of Fish and Wildlife
- Approving Agency Role
- Responsible Agency
- Approved On
- County Clerk
- Yolo
- Final Environmental Document Available at
- at the office location listed above for the Lead Agency. CDFW’s record of project approval as Responsible Agency is available at CDFW’s regional office.
Determinations
- (1) The project will have a significant impact on the environment
- No
- (2a) An Environmental Impact Report was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes
- (2b) A Mitigated or a Negative Declaration was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (2c) An other document type was prepared for this project pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- No
- (3) Mitigated measures were made a condition of the approval of the project
- Yes
- (4) A mitigation reporting or monitoring plan was adopted for this project
- No
- (5) A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for this project
- No
- (6) Findings were made pursuant to the provisions of CEQA
- Yes